[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AC92A65.40806@goop.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:06:13 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Bastian Blank <bastian@...di.eu.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Stable Kernel <stable@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq helper
On 10/04/09 11:30, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The stack protector needs additional registers on x86_32, which are not
> saved in calls to the small paravirt interrupt handlers. This leads to
> early crashes as registers are overwritten and not saved by the caller
> as instructed.
>
Thanks for the patch, but I don't think its quite right.
PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK() is responsible for generating a wrapper for
the functions to save/restore all the appropriate registers. If it is
failing to do so, then the correct fix is to update
PV_SAVE/RESTORE_ALL_CALLER_REGS.
Or have I misunderstood you analysis?
Thanks,
J
> Signed-off-by: Bastian Blank <waldi@...ian.org>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> index 3bb4fc2..ac19398 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> @@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_irq.o = -pg
> endif
>
> -# Make sure early boot has no stackprotector
> nostackp := $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
> CFLAGS_enlighten.o := $(nostackp)
> +CFLAGS_irq.o := $(nostackp)
> CFLAGS_mmu.o := $(nostackp)
>
> obj-y := enlighten.o setup.o multicalls.o mmu.o irq.o \
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists