[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AC87851.30501@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:26:25 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: add io services to xinterface
On 10/02/2009 10:19 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> We want to add a more efficient way to get PIO signals out of the guest,
> so we add an "xioevent" interface. This allows a client to register
> for notifications when a specific MMIO/PIO address is touched by
> the guest. This is an alternative interface to ioeventfd, which is
> performance limited by io-bus scaling and eventfd wait-queue based
> notification mechanism. This also has the advantage of retaining
> the full PIO data payload and passing it to the recipient.
>
>
Can you detail the problems with io-bus scaling and eventfd
wait-queues? Maybe we should fix these instead.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists