linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: block/drbd tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091005084949.GU26573@kernel.dk>
Date:	Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:49:50 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	david@...g.hm
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
	drbd-dev@...bit.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: block/drbd tree build failure

On Mon, Oct 05 2009, david@...g.hm wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 05 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Jens,
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>>
>>> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c: In function '_drbd_start_io_acct':
>>> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:43: error: subscripted value is neither array nor pointer
>>> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c: In function '_drbd_end_io_acct':
>>> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:56: error: subscripted value is neither array nor pointer
>>>
>>> I reported a similar error against the dbd tree, which was fixed, but now
>>> the commit that caused that error has been reverted and thus we get
>>> this :-(
>>>
>>> I have reverted the drbd commits from the block tree for today.
>>
>> That's probably my fault, not drbd. I moved it to a new branch since it
>> isn't going into 2.6.32, and perhaps dropped that fix along the way.
>> I'll look into it.
>
>
> what needs to happen to get drbd accepted at this point? It sounded like  
> they had the tree in good shape to be merged, except for the desire that  
> was expressed to have them re-work all existing raid implementations  
> before adding their code (and it sounded like that was not going to be  
> allowed to hold it up)

Linus said he was happy to merge it, but that .32 had slipped now
unfortunately. Usually it's not a problem to merge drivers later than
-rc1, but the discussion surrounding drdb makes it less of a no brainer.

So I expect to merge drbd for .33.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/