[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091005095543.GA4266@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:55:43 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: "K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perf_core: provide a kernel-internal interface to
get to performance counters
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> Can't we instead modify the perf events to be able to run on multiple
> contexts?
>
> We could change struct perf_event::ctx into a list of context and then
> attach it to several cpu contexts.
>
> The perf event struct have been designed to run on only one context so
> its structure and handling does not deal with races due to concurrent
> uses I guess. But at a first glance, few things would need to be
> modified to handle that, and at a low cost.
>
> There might be bad corner cases I forget though...
Dunno, i assumed it wouldnt be possible sanely. If you tried a patch we
could argue about the particulars ...
This would in essence create a new event type: system-wide. It doesnt
scale in its naive implementation - which would be fine for low freq
events.
We could encode it via sys_perf_event_open(pid:-1, cpu:-1).
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists