[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091005104955.GA14852@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:19:55 +0530
From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: hw-breakpoints: Actually flush thread
breakpoints in flush_thread().
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:23:06PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> [ I noticed this whilst hacking up SH support, applies to the current
> tracing/hw-breakpoints topic branch. ]
>
> flush_thread() tries to do a TIF_DEBUG check before calling in to
> flush_thread_hw_breakpoint() (which subsequently clears the thread flag),
> but for some reason, the x86 code is manually clearing TIF_DEBUG
> immediately before the test, so this path will never be taken.
>
> This kills off the erroneous clear_tsk_thread_flag() and lets
> flush_thread_hw_breakpoint() actually get invoked.
>
Yes, this is wrong and we missed it. Thanks for fixing!
> Presumably folks were getting lucky with testing and the
> free_thread_info() -> free_thread_xstate() path was taking care of the
> flush there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Acked-by: K.Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists