[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49my457uef.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:06:00 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ulrich Lukas <stellplatz-nr.13a@...enparkplatz.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
mikew@...gle.com, fchecconi@...il.com, paolo.valente@...more.it,
ryov@...inux.co.jp, fernando@....ntt.co.jp,
dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
righi.andrea@...il.com, m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com, agk@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
jmarchan@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Do we support ioprio on SSDs with NCQ (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10)
Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com> writes:
> Moreover, I suggest removing also the slice_resid part, since its
> semantics doesn't seem consistent.
> When computed, it is not the residency, but the remaining time slice.
It stands for residual, not residency. Make more sense?
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists