linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] signals: send_signal: use si_fromuser() to detect from_ancestor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091005195544.GA5377@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:55:44 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	roland@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] signals: send_signal: use si_fromuser() to detect
	from_ancestor_ns

On 10/05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 10/05, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> >
> > Oleg Nesterov [oleg@...hat.com] wrote:
>
> > | So, imho this patch also fixes this case by accident,
> >
> > This part I am not sure.  But as mentioned above, from_ancestor_ns is 0
> > and the SIGKILL will not queued right ?
>
> Yes, you are right, see above.
>
> I meant, it fixes the from-user logic, not from_ancestor_ns logic.

Hmm. When I re-read that email, I do not understand any longer
what I reallly meant when I said "this patch also fixes this case" :)

Anyway, you are right, thanks for correcting me.OH

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/