| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4e5e476b0910051326g559bf135ma3cf82219ade497@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 22:26:52 +0200 From: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com> To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: bug in elevator/cfq regarding start_time? On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote: >> Good spotting! So we can either add the same copy in cfq, or we can just >> move the ->start_time check and assignment in attempt_merge() to post >> the elv_merge_requests() call. I think the latter would work fine, but >> I'll check and fix tomorrow. > > I think there is still something buggy regarding those timestamps. False alarm. I just found that the list was not yet filled at that place in the code. Corrado -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists