linux-kernel - Re: [git pull request] ACPI Processor Aggregator Driver for 2.6.32-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0910051354450.3432@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull request] ACPI Processor Aggregator Driver for
 2.6.32-rc1



On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> This thing has already been merged, it appears: and it looks like a 
> total breakage of rules to me.

Well, Len pointed out to me that the NAK is kind of pointless, since it 
had no constructive alternatives to the issue. So he left it in as 
documentation, but until the scheduler people can actually _do_ something 
about the problem, their voice doesn't really matter, does it?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/