[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091005215548.GH6071@nowhere>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:55:50 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tracing/kprobes v2 1/5] tracing/kprobes: Rename special
variables syntax
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 05:34:24PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hmm, one idea hits me, how about this? :)
> - %register
> - %%spvars (%%retval, %%arg0)
The problem is that such % or %% symbols have a specific
mean in some other well known areas.
If we borrow the % from the AT&T assembly syntax style
to use register names, that we can retrieve in gcc inline
assembly, then one may expect %% to have a meaning inspired
from the same area. %% has its sense in gcc inline assembly,
but applied there, it looks confusing.
I mean, I'm trying to think like someone reading a perf probe
command line without any documentation. The more this person
can understand this command line without documentation, the better.
We know that % is used for register names, some people know that %%
is used for register names too but when we are in gcc inline assembly
with var to reg resolution and need true registers name.
Then if I try to mirror this sense from gcc to perf probe use,
I feel confused, especially in the case of %%arg1.
In this case, we should rather have %%register and %arg0 :)
Hm, %register is a clear pattern.
Somehow, %retval looks clear too, retval is verbose enough and
% is still logical as return values are most of the time (always?)
put in a register.
But %%arg0 looks confusing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists