[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200910060037.57546.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 00:37:57 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] kernel/power/: use pr_<level> and add pr_fmt(fmt)
On Monday 05 October 2009, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 21:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday 05 October 2009, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Added #define pr_fmt(fmt) "PM: " fmt
> > > Converted printk(KERN_<level> to pr_<level>(
> > > Removed "PM: " prefix
> > > Added pr_fmt() to __initdata strings
> >
> > Well, can you please tell me what actually is wrong with the current code?
>
> Not much. There were a couple of trivial corrections,
> but perhaps the changes add a bit more flexibility and
> regularity.
>
> Effective trivial changes:
>
> o Added KERN_CONT (pr_cont) to a couple of messages
> o Added "PM: " (pr_info) to an #ifdef'd message
> o Added "PM: " (pr_info) to a printk "Syncing filesystems ..."
> in power/user.c
The patch as is conflicts with the changes I have queued up for 2.6.33
(they'll appear in linux-next after I've fixed all build issues, hopefully
tomorrow). For one example, we're dropping swsusp.c altogether.
Also, I'm not a big fan of automatic conversions from printk() to
pr_something() other than pr_debug().
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists