[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091005171419.5464502d@jbarnes-g45>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:14:19 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc: "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@...el.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"matthew@....cx" <matthew@....cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ACS v3 1/1]
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:17:21 -0700
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> wrote:
> * Kay, Allen M (allen.m.kay@...el.com) wrote:
> > On the other hand, can we say VT-d PT mode is mainly for KVM
> > virtualization use case? If so, is it reasonable to say
> > performance of host P2P in this mode is not of highest priority?
>
> Guess it depends on the workload. Would be helpful to identify a use
> case that is p2p heavy (and then the impact of enabling ACS).
>
> > If not, another option is to have a kernel boot parameter to
> > configure an kernel boot instance to be either host kernel
> > optimized or virtualization optimized. I don't know whether this
> > is a reasonable or not ...
>
> I was thinking that ACS could be enabled if an IOMMU is enabled. Not
> a perfect fit, but seems reasonably close.
Allen, did you want to do these changes as an incremental patch on your
last one or just send me a replacement? Either way is fine with me.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists