[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091006163748.1263.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:44:36 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc patch 3/3] mm: munlock COW pages on truncation unmap
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 10:56:55PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > >> Umm..
> > >> I haven't understand this.
> > >>
> > >> (1) unmap_mapping_range() is called twice.
> > >>
> > >> unmap_mapping_range(mapping, new + PAGE_SIZE - 1, 0, 1);
> > >> truncate_inode_pages(mapping, new);
> > >> unmap_mapping_range(mapping, new + PAGE_SIZE - 1, 0, 1);
> > >>
> > >> (2) PG_mlock is turned on from mlock() and vmscan.
> > >> (3) vmscan grab anon_vma, but mlock don't grab anon_vma.
> > >
> > > You are right, I was so focused on the LRU side that I missed an
> > > obvious window here: an _explicit_ mlock can still happen between the
> > > PG_mlocked clearing section and releasing the page.
>
> Okay, so what are the opinions on this? Would you consider my patches
> to fix the most likely issues? Dropping them in favor of looking for
> a complete fix? Revert the warning on freeing PG_mlocked pages?
Honestly, I don't have any good idea. but luckly, we have enough time.
the false-positve warning is not so big problem. then, I prefer looking for
complete solusion.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists