[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091006190938.126F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:11:06 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] add MAP_UNLOCKED mmap flag
Hi
> If application does mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) it is no longer possible to
> mmap file bigger than main memory or allocate big area of anonymous
> memory. Sometimes it is desirable to lock everything related to program
> execution into memory, but still be able to mmap big file or allocate
> huge amount of memory and allow OS to swap them on demand. MAP_UNLOCKED
> allows to do that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Why don't you use explicit munlock()?
Plus, Can you please elabrate which workload nedd this feature?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists