[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ACA90F2.1060909@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:36:02 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Bastian Blank <bastian@...di.eu.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Stable Kernel <stable@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: Disable stack protector for irq
helper
On 10/05/09 15:43, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 10:21:01AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>>> Save all caller-saved registers on x86_32 for the paravirt callee saved
>>> registers.
>>>
>> That looks better, but it is still overkill. We only need to save the
>> set of registers the ABI requires the callee to preserve. What
>> additional register(s) gets clobbered by stack-protector that need to be
>> saved?
>>
> Well, exactly the two, ecx and edx. eax is still clobbered by the return
> value. Anyway, it works in praxis.
I'm confused. It already saves ecx, so what else needs saving?
Besides, most of the code in that file isn't used unless you're using a
very old version of Xen; it will generally prefer to use the ones in
xen-asm_X.S.
I have the feeling we haven't really found the root cause of your
problem yet.
Thanks,
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists