linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] mfd: ADP5520 Multifunction LCD Backlight and KeypadInput Device Driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091006123658.GA31079@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:36:58 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>
Cc:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mfd: ADP5520 Multifunction LCD Backlight and
 KeypadInput Device Driver

On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:23:52PM +0100, Hennerich, Michael wrote:
> >From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com]

> >This notifier stuff looks an awful lot like an interrupt controller
> >driver.  Now that it's possible to implement support for an I2C/SPI
> >driven interrupt controller it'd be good to use that rather than having
> >a custom API if that's possible.

> Honestly this notifier chain is a clean approach and serves its purpose
> here pretty well.
> IMHO it's much more preferable than pretending there is a virtual GPIO
> that doesn't exist and a MFD subdev could request.

I'm not sure what the association with virtual gpios is?  This is all
separate to gpiolib except in that it would mean that a gpio driver for
the device would be able to export these interrupts to its clients.

> >> +	u8 led_on_time;

> >I don't know exactly what the on_time option does but if it controls
> >hardware-implemented blinking there's actually a callback function the

> Yes its hardware controlled blinking. I noticed the leds timer trigger
> driver.
> People can still use it - the downside with the hardware assisted
> blinking is that all LEDs share the same on_time. So I decided against
> using the callback.

Ah, if it affects all LEDs then it isn't suitable for the callback at
all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/