linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf trace: Update eval_flag() flags array to match interrupt.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091006152106.GA6490@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:21:06 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf trace: Update eval_flag() flags array to
	match interrupt.h

On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 05:19:00PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Yeah. We may want to do that by including trace/events/irq.h
> and then use the show_softirq_name() macro defined there.
> 
> The rest of the header can be wrapped through no-op macros and
> stub includes.

No, not at all.  Performance tracing tools really should not be
dependent on the kernel source.  This kind of creep is exactly what I
feared from putting the perf source in the kernel tree.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/