linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200910061840.57681.elendil@planet.nl>
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:40:56 +0200
From:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, hohndel@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3

Linus Torvalds wrote:

>> One option would be to make LOCALVERSION_AUTO compulsory.
> 
> Yes, I could live with that. If you're compiling from a git tree, we
> might as well show the real version.

Not sure I'd like that.Actually pretty sure I'd hate it.
It would completely break the clean mechanism I currently have (described 
in my previous post).

Enabling it by default somehow would be fine with me, but "compulsory" is a 
step to far IMO. Users should always be allowed custom schemes.

Cheers,
FJP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/