[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ACB7B4D.8080203@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:15:57 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@...radead.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So how about this?
>
> It changes how CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO works, in the following trivial
> way:
>
> - if it is set, things work the way they always have, and you get a
> extended kernel release like
>
> 2.6.32-rc3-00052-g0eca52a-dirty
>
> - but if it is _not_ set,
[...]
> we append just "+", so you get a version number like
>
> 2.6.32-rc3+
[...]
> The "+" could be anything else, of course. The diff is pretty obvious, you
> can argue about exactly _what_ you'd like to see as a suffix for "and then
> some".
The "+" suffix is already in informal use with a different meaning.
It's customary to write "For feature XY, you need kernel 2.6.31+" as a
shorthand for "kernel 2.6.31 or any later release".
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= =-=- --==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists