[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091006173340.GA25502@Krystal>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:33:40 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] vunmap: Fix racy use of rcu_head
* Christoph Lameter (cl@...ux-foundation.org) wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > Simplest fix: directly kfree the data structure rather than doing it lazily.
>
> The delay is necessary as far as I can tell for performance reasons. But
> Nick was the last one fiddling around with the subsystem as far as I
> remember. CCing him. May be he has a minute to think about a fix that
> preserved performance.
>
Thanks,
More info on the problem:
I added a check in alloc_vmap_area() at:
va = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct vmap_area),
gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK, node);
WARN_ON(va->rcu_head.debug == LIST_POISON1);
(memory allocation debugging is off in my config)
I used this along with my new call rcu debug patch to check if memory is
reallocated before the callback (doing kfree) is executed. It triggers
this:
WARNING: at mm/vmalloc.c:343 alloc_vmap_area+0x305/0x340()
Hardware name: X7DAL
Modules linked in: loop ltt_statedump ltt_userspace_event ipc_tr]
Pid: 5584, comm: ltt-disarmall Not tainted 2.6.30.9-trace #41
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff802b8665>] ? alloc_vmap_area+0x305/0x340
[<ffffffff802b8665>] ? alloc_vmap_area+0x305/0x340
[<ffffffff8023cf29>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x79/0xd0
[<ffffffff802b8665>] ? alloc_vmap_area+0x305/0x340
[<ffffffff80237670>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x10
[<ffffffff802b8769>] ? __get_vm_area_node+0xc9/0x1d0
[<ffffffff805ae965>] ? sys_getsockopt+0x85/0x160
[<ffffffff8040f160>] ? ltt_vtrace+0x0/0x8d0
[<ffffffff802b88dd>] ? get_vm_area_caller+0x2d/0x40
[<ffffffff8068bc3e>] ? arch_imv_update+0x10e/0x2f0
[<ffffffff802b93aa>] ? vmap+0x4a/0x80
[<ffffffff8068bc3e>] ? arch_imv_update+0x10e/0x2f0
[<ffffffff80283e6d>] ? get_tracepoint+0x25d/0x290
[<ffffffff80280b93>] ? imv_update_range+0x53/0xa0
[<ffffffff80284821>] ? tracepoint_update_probes+0x21/0x30
[<ffffffff802848b3>] ? tracepoint_probe_update_all+0x83/0x100
[<ffffffff80282ac1>] ? marker_update_probes+0x21/0x40
[<ffffffff8040f160>] ? ltt_vtrace+0x0/0x8d0
[<ffffffff80282d5d>] ? marker_probe_unregister+0xad/0x130
[<ffffffff8040b9dc>] ? ltt_marker_disconnect+0xdc/0x120
[<ffffffff804121d2>] ? marker_enable_write+0x112/0x120
[<ffffffff80688dd0>] ? _spin_unlock+0x10/0x30
[<ffffffff802e6b36>] ? mnt_drop_write+0x76/0x180
[<ffffffff802d96dd>] ? do_filp_open+0x2cd/0xa00
[<ffffffff804377c1>] ? tty_write+0x221/0x270
[<ffffffff802cc6cb>] ? vfs_write+0xcb/0x170
[<ffffffff802cc914>] ? sys_write+0x64/0x130
[<ffffffff8020beab>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
---[ end trace 7ef506680d7a9e26 ]---
Could it be that:
static void __free_vmap_area(struct vmap_area *va)
{
BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_NODE(&va->rb_node));
rb_erase(&va->rb_node, &vmap_area_root);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&va->rb_node);
list_del_rcu(&va->list);
call_rcu(&va->rcu_head, rcu_free_va);
}
(especially clearing from the rb tree and va list)
allows reallocation of the node by kmalloc_node before its reclamation
(only done later by rcu_free_va) ?
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists