[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091006173508.GA4786@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:35:08 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@...radead.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [patch] kbuild: Improve version string logic
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Unless:
> >
> > > _That_ i think is a lot harder to confuse with the real .31 than a
> > > v2.6.31-1234-g16123c4 version string.
> >
> > .. are you saying that it would be just some automatically generated
> > thing, just a crippled form of CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO? Kind of a
> > CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO_SHORTFORM?
>
> So how about this?
this patch is great IMHO. I've modified it to propagate the '+' into the
long version string as well. I've tested it with auto-version not set
and it now gives:
Linux europe 2.6.32-rc3+ #2 SMP Tue Oct 6 19:26:58 CEST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
the -rc3+ is a clearly visible distinction. This will improve things
when bugs are reported with LOCALVERSION_AUTO not set - we'll always
know when a tree is not vanilla.
With autoversion set 'uname -a' gives:
Linux europe 2.6.32-rc3+00052-g0eca52a-dirty #3 SMP Tue Oct 6 19:29:54 CEST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
IMO that's intuitive too. We get whatever is described in the
localversion in addition to the tag. The '+' clearly signals that 'set
union' operation we've done.
So this patch solves all the problems i had with our versioning. I've
attached it below with a changelog.
Thanks,
Ingo
--------------->
Subject: kbuild: Improve version string logic
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
It changes how CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO works, in the following trivial
way:
- if it is set, things work the way they always have, and you get a
extended kernel release like:
2.6.32-rc3+00052-g0eca52a-dirty
( with the difference that the extra version string is separated via
'+' not via '-'. This improves visibility when we have additional
changes over a vanilla tag. )
- but if it is _not_ set, we'll still try to get a version from the
underlying SCM (we actually support git, hg and SVN right now, even if
some comments may say "git only"), and if the underlying SCM says it
has a local version, we append just "+", so you get a version number
like:
2.6.32-rc3+
IOW, you'd never get 2.6.32-rc0, but you'd get either the complex git
version number (or SVN/hg/whatever), or at least "2.6.31+" with the "+"
showing that it is more than plain 2.6.31.
The "+" could be anything else, of course. The diff is pretty obvious, you
can argue about exactly _what_ you'd like to see as a suffix for "and then
some".
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
Makefile | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/Makefile
+++ linux/Makefile
@@ -963,16 +963,21 @@ localver = $(subst $(space),, $(string)
# .scmversion is used when generating rpm packages so we do not loose
# the version information from the SCM when we do the build of the kernel
# from the copied source
-ifdef CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO
-
ifeq ($(wildcard .scmversion),)
_localver-auto = $(shell $(CONFIG_SHELL) \
- $(srctree)/scripts/setlocalversion $(srctree))
+ $(srctree)/scripts/setlocalversion $(srctree) | sed 's/^-/+/')
else
_localver-auto = $(shell cat .scmversion 2> /dev/null)
endif
+ifdef CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO
localver-auto = $(LOCALVERSION)$(_localver-auto)
+else
+ ifeq ($_localver-auto,)
+ localver-auto = $(LOCALVERSION)
+ else
+ localver-auto = $(LOCALVERSION)+
+ endif
endif
localver-full = $(localver)$(localver-auto)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists