lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0910061035050.3432@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	kyle@...artin.ca
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git patches] parisc for 2.6.32



On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Kyle McMartin wrote:
<
> Mostly fixes, except for the tracehook stuff...

I don't see how this can be fixes, since I can't recall any parisc pulls 
during the merge window.

Yes, there have been parisc changes, but they've all come in through 
commits that either were global and people also fixed up parisc while at 
it (eg things like "fcntl: add F_[SG]ETOWN_EX"), or they have been build 
cleanups where you were cc'd but apparently never even bothered to ack the 
change.

So now you come in after the merge window has been closed for over a week, 
and want to do a parisc merge?

Tell me why I should take this. Tell me why I shouldn't just wait until 
the next merge window (or rather "_you_ should have waited").

I've now had two pull requests just today that made me go "I don't really 
see why I should pull this after -rc3 is out".

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ