linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
cc:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, mingo@...e.hu,
	hohndel@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3

On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Stefan Richter wrote:

> Frans Pop wrote:
> > Developers are supposed to be able to take care of themselves;
> 
> _People who build kernels from sources which differ from releases_ are
> supposed to take care of themselves.

Yes. If you compile a random development kernel, you'd better then not 
come and whine to developers about how you can't tell which version it is. 
Especially when we do have things like CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO exactly 
for this case.

But it's possible that people really just weren't aware of that whole 
LOCALVERSION_AUTO thing.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/