linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091006181218.GD24677@mit.edu>
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:12:18 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@...radead.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3

On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 06:40:28PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Could we, for consistency's sake, make it:
> 
>  	2.6.32-rc3+00052-g0eca52a-dirty
>  	2.6.32-rc3+
> 
> ? Or do we want to keep the old version string alone for some reason?

I'm a bit concerned that changing from what we've currently had:

>       2.6.29-00052-g0eca52a-dirty

might break some packaging scripts.  I'm also personally used to that
naming scheme; in fact at the moment I'm using
2.6.32-rc1-00292-gb0390e2.  :-)

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/