[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091006181713.GC5216@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:17:13 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
Cc: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH linux-2.6-block#for-linus] Seperate read and
write statistics of in_flight requests v2
On Tue, Oct 06 2009, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> [Sorry, resending as the previous mail was word-wrapped]
>
> Commit a9327cac440be4d8333bba975cbbf76045096275 added seperate read
> and write statistics of in_flight requests. And exported the number
> of read and write requests in progress seperately through sysfs.
>
> But Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com> reported getting strange
> output from "iostat -kx 2". Global values for service time and
> utilization were garbage. For interval values, utilization was always
> 100%, and service time is higher than normal.
>
> So this was reverted by commit 0f78ab9899e9d6acb09d5465def618704255963b
>
> The problem was in part_round_stats_single(), I missed the following:
> if (now == part->stamp)
> return;
>
> - if (part->in_flight) {
> + if (part_in_flight(part)) {
> __part_stat_add(cpu, part, time_in_queue,
> part_in_flight(part) * (now - part->stamp));
> __part_stat_add(cpu, part, io_ticks, (now - part->stamp));
>
> With this chunk included, the reported regression gets fixed.
Thanks, applied.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists