linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0910061116180.3432@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@...radead.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3



On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
> 
> It's actually not quite so bad.  If you take into account
> Extraversion, the stats that you get look like this[1]:

I'm a moron. Thanks. I wanted to do just a simple grep, and in the process 
I entirely missed that obvious thing.

> That actually shows that well over half of the commit based off of
> 2.6.31 were actually based off of some 2.6.31-rc release, based on
> something *before* 2.6.31 released.

Yup. Goodie. And I feel much better about our development environment now, 
since that is how it's supposed to work.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/