[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091006185344.GA19692@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:53:44 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][RFC] add MAP_UNLOCKED mmap flag
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:34:36PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:02:18PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mman.h b/include/asm-generic/mman.h
> > index 32c8bd6..59e0f29 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/mman.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/mman.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > #define MAP_NONBLOCK 0x10000 /* do not block on IO */
> > #define MAP_STACK 0x20000 /* give out an address that is best suited for process/thread stacks */
> > #define MAP_HUGETLB 0x40000 /* create a huge page mapping */
> > +#define MAP_UNLOCKED 0x80000 /* force page unlocking */
> >
> > #define MCL_CURRENT 1 /* lock all current mappings */
> > #define MCL_FUTURE 2 /* lock all future mappings */
> > diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> > index 73f5e4b..7c2abdb 100644
> > --- a/mm/mmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> > @@ -985,6 +985,9 @@ unsigned long do_mmap_pgoff(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> > if (!can_do_mlock())
> > return -EPERM;
> >
> > + if (flags & MAP_UNLOKED)
> > + vm_flags &= ~VM_LOCKED;
>
> That needs changing into MAP_UNLOCKED as well.
>
That's for editing patch manually :(
> Should we do something special about (MAP_UNLOCKED | MAP_LOCKED)?
It is simpler to just ignore it. What do you think?
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists