linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
From:	david@...g.hm
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, mingo@...e.hu,
	hohndel@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3

On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Stefan Richter wrote:
>
>> Frans Pop wrote:
>>> Developers are supposed to be able to take care of themselves;
>>
>> _People who build kernels from sources which differ from releases_ are
>> supposed to take care of themselves.
>
> Yes. If you compile a random development kernel, you'd better then not
> come and whine to developers about how you can't tell which version it is.
> Especially when we do have things like CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO exactly
> for this case.
>
> But it's possible that people really just weren't aware of that whole
> LOCALVERSION_AUTO thing.

I will say that I was not aware of it, and I've been using kernel.org 
kernels for many years.

I'm glad to see it there. enabling it by default would probably be a very 
good thing.

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/