linux-kernel - Re: [patch] kbuild: Improve version string logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:45:58 +0200
From:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	hohndel@...radead.org, lenb@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] kbuild: Improve version string logic

Johannes Berg wrote:
> I think adding the + unconditionally will also break things like
> debian's make-kpkg, for instance, since the + would get propagated into
> the package version which reserves the + for something else.

Are you sure? AFAIK it would be propagated into the package _name_, where 
it is allowed. And even if it were part of the package version, it would 
be in the "upstream" part of the version number, where it is also allowed.

The only reserved use of "+" I'm aware of is in the Debian part of the 
package version.

But I have not used make-kpkg in ages, so I'm not 100% sure how that builds 
the package version. I could be that it duplicates the kernel version in 
both the package name and the upstream part of the package version, but 
that should still be OK.

Cheers,
FJP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/