[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0910051700440.31688@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@...il.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #14141] order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> And the winner is:
> 2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53 is first bad commit
> commit 2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53
> Author: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> Date: Tue Jun 16 15:32:56 2009 -0700
>
> oom: move oom_adj value from task_struct to mm_struct
>
> I'm confident that the bisection is good. The test case was very reliable
> while zooming in on the merge from akpm.
>
I doubt it for two reasons: (i) this commit was reverted in 0753ba0 since
2.6.31-rc7 and is no longer in the kernel, and (ii) these are GFP_ATOMIC
allocations which would be unaffected by oom killer scores.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists