linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "Revert "ide: try to use PIO Mode 0 during probe if possible""

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091006.154120.153174904.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bzolnier@...il.com
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, joao.ramos@...v.pt, david@...es.net,
	d.stussy@...oo.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "Revert "ide: try to use PIO Mode 0 during
 probe if possible""

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:27:45 +0200

> The root cause of reported system hangs was (now fixed) sis5513 bug
> and not "ide: try to use PIO Mode 0 during probe if possible" change
> (commit 6029336426a2b43e4bc6f4a84be8789a047d139e) so the revert was
> incorrect (it simply replaced one regression with the other one).

What is this older "regression" fixed by the PIO-0 change?

You're not explaining it and neither does the commit message for the
PIO-0 change.

Please, fill us in :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/