[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ACBD841.1080109@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:52:33 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: cl@...ux-foundation.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V5 01/19] Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_*
operations
cl@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
> atomic operations.
percpu#for-next is for the most part a stable tree and 1-12 are
already in the tree. Can you please send the changes based on the
current percpu#for-next?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists