[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091006000911.GB4390@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:09:11 -0700
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
roland@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] signals: SEND_SIG_NOINFO should be considered as
SI_FROMUSER()
Oleg Nesterov [oleg@...hat.com] wrote:
| No changes in compiled code. The patch adds the new helper, si_fromuser()
| and changes check_kill_permission() to use this helper.
|
| The real effect of this patch is that from now we "officially" consider
| SEND_SIG_NOINFO signal as "from user-space" signals. This is already true
| if we look at the code which uses SEND_SIG_NOINFO, except __send_signal()
| has another opinion - see the next patch.
|
| The naming of these special SEND_SIG_XXX siginfo's is really bad imho.
| >From __send_signal()'s pov they mean
|
| SEND_SIG_NOINFO from user
| SEND_SIG_PRIV from kernel
| SEND_SIG_FORCED no info
|
| Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Renaming the special siginfo cases be done independently.
Reviewed-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists