[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091007062204.GE21673@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:22:04 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf tools: Merge trace.info content into
perf.data
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is an attempt to remove the trace.info file. It works well for
> me, the reason for it to be an RFC is that I have doubts about the
> backward compatibility.
>
> A file created by perf after his patch is unsupported by previous
> version because the size of the headers have increased.
That's OK i think in terms of trace.info - trace.info was a temporary
hack to begin with.
> That said, it's two new fields that have been added in the end of the
> headers, and those could be ignored by previous versions if they just
> handled the dynamic header size and then ignore the unknow part. The
> offsets guarantee the compatibility.
Yes, that's how it should work.
> But previous versions handle the header size using its static size,
> not dynamic, then it's not backward compatible.
>
> Anyway, I'm not sure exactly how to handle that.
That's a bug in the previous version - mind doing a standalone fix for
that so we can mark it Cc: stable?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists