linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/45] writeback: quit on wrap for .range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091007102130.GQ30316@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:21:30 +0200
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Myklebust Trond <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	"jens.axboe@...cle.com" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/45] writeback: quit on wrap for .range_cyclic (afs)

On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:17:06AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > Convert wbc.range_cyclic to new behavior: when past EOF, abort writeback
> > of the inode, which instructs writeback_single_inode() to delay it for
> > a while if necessary.
> > 
> > It removes one inefficient .range_cyclic IO pattern when writeback_index
> > wraps:
> > 	submit [10000-10100], (wrap), submit [0-100]
> > In which the submitted pages may be consisted of two distant ranges.
> > 
> > It also prevents submitting pointless IO for busy overwriters.
> > 
> > CC: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> 
> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>

I don't see why. Then the inode is given less write bandwidth than
those which don't wrap (or wrap on "nice" boundaries).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/