[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091007141332.GA21320@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:13:32 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/9] perf trace: Add Perl scripting support
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 11:09:25PM -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > I think we also want to have a 'perf -s *' kind of thing to get a list
> > of all available language modules.
> >
>
> I knew somebody would point that out (and suggest a better way ;-) That
> all makes sense - I'll make these changes in the next version.
I'm a bit worried about linking two million scripting language into the
main perf binary. Can't we just have seaprate perlperf / pythonperf,
rubyperf, awkperf binaries that only contain the scripting support?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists