[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091007142330.GA8622@localhost>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:23:30 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Myklebust Trond <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
"jens.axboe@...cle.com" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/45] writeback: quit on wrap for .range_cyclic
(pohmelfs)
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 08:32:11PM +0800, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:38:27PM +0800, Wu Fengguang (fengguang.wu@...el.com) wrote:
> > Convert wbc.range_cyclic to new behavior: when past EOF, abort writeback
> > of the inode, which instructs writeback_single_inode() to delay it for
> > a while if necessary.
> >
> > It removes one inefficient .range_cyclic IO pattern when writeback_index
> > wraps:
> > submit [10000-10100], (wrap), submit [0-100]
> > In which the submitted pages may be consisted of two distant ranges.
> >
> > It also prevents submitting pointless IO for busy overwriters.
>
> I have no objections against this patchset, since I followed the
> upstream writeback behaviour and did not personally observe such wraps
> which would be otherwise handled in a single run.
OK, thanks!
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists