[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091007023119.GJ17883@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 22:31:19 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, G@....edu
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@...radead.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc3
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:22:38AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Why don't you just have the kernel version Linux-commitid?
>
> why keep up the pretense that the 2.6.xx bit means anything outside of release?
>
> You could just have the tarball generation scripts make it into a 2.6.31 but
> for everyone else we never see it.
The tarball generation scripts for the daily snapshots already set
EXTRAVERSION to -git15, -git16, etc.
So the problem seems to be localized to those users/developers who are
smart enough to use git, and dumb enough not to set
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO. So big of a set this actually is, I can't
say. Do we have any statistics about how many bug reporters make this
mistake?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists