lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ACCB3EA.3040209@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:29:46 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V5 01/19] Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_*
 operations

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
>> cl@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>>> This patch introduces two things: First this_cpu_ptr and then per cpu
>>> atomic operations.
>> percpu#for-next is for the most part a stable tree and 1-12 are
>> already in the tree.  Can you please send the changes based on the
>> current percpu#for-next?
> 
> ok should get to it by the afternoon.

thanks!

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ