linux-kernel - Re: [regression, bisected] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <878wfnt9je.fsf@scholz.fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date:	Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:10:13 +0200
From:	Jan Scholz <scholz@...s.uni-frankfurt.de>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Jan Scholz <scholz@...s.uni-frankfurt.de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [regression, bisected] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram

Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> writes:

>> Alternatively, you could introduce a new flag IRQF_NOSUSPEND and use that
>> instead of IRQF_TIMER.  That would be cleaner than using IRQF_TIMER for
>> non-timer interrupts IMHO.
>
> I totally agree. The current patch is still good for stable though.
>
> I'll send it to Greg after I've upstreamed it, we can introduce IRQF_NOSUSPEND
> in a second patch.

How's upstreaming going? I can neither find the patch in Linus branch,
nor in linux-next. Could it be that it got lost?

Cheers,
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/