[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200910072241.54869.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:41:54 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: suspend tree build failure
On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:31:55 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the notification.
> >
> > Did you cross-compile it by chance? It builds for me on native x86_64 with
> > allmodconfig, which is why I missed this issue.
>
> I cross compile all my x86 builds as my big machines are all PowerPC.
>
> > > I have used the version of the suspend tree from next-20091002 for today.
> >
> > I added the #include <linux/compiler.h> to freezer.h, but obviously I couldn't
> > verify if that fixed the problem. Hopefully it did.
>
> My guess was wrong. You either need to leave the __cold off the
> definition in kernel/freezer.c or move it before the function name. No
> other function definition in the kernel is marked __cold, but several
> declarations are.
>
> Also __cold only generates something for gcc >= 4.3 ... I am using 4.4.
OK, I've dropped the patch altogether for now, will add it later.
Just pushed the updated tree.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists