linux-kernel - Re: DirectFB "Fusion" module inclusion?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ACD0DA9.2090707@nortel.com>
Date:	Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:52:41 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Niels Roest <niels@...ectfb.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DirectFB "Fusion" module inclusion?

On 10/07/2009 07:02 AM, Niels Roest wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> This is to request some comments about our interest to have our "Fusion" 
> kernel module included in the kernel.
> I hope you will let me now if it is feasible, desirable, etcetera.

My initial reaction is that aside from everything else the naming is
unfortunate since there is already a "Fusion" device driver, controlled
by the CONFIG_FUSION config option.

Adding a new CONFIG_FUSION_DEVICE for something totally different seems
ripe for confusion.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/