[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0910072356050.15183@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:58:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] BKL not necessary in cpuid_open
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Hmm, I'm discovering that in tip:rt/kill-the-bkl
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=55968ede164ae523692f00717f50cd926f1382a0
> >
> > Looks like we have overlaped.
> >
> > Thomas it would be nice to post these patches on LKML (or I missed
> > them?) and may be to merge them into tip:master, so that they are
> > visible and then we lower the risk of any duplicate works in this area.
>
> Now guess why I mentioned this branch sevaral times at the rt summit
> last week. It's even documented in Jonathans excellent meeting
> minutes on lwn.net :)
>
Well, the overlap is unfortunate but I did do a git diff with
tip/core/kill-the-BKL BEFORE I posted.
not sure what the difference is between
tip/kill-the-BKL
and
tip/core/kill-the-BKL
btw
Also
git describe 55968ede164ae523692f00717f50cd926f1382a0
v2.6.31-rc6-4-g55968ed
Not sure what to make of that either, since my patch was against the
latest linus updated this morning.
Frederic: what was your method to discover that patch from Thomas?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists