[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1254965540.1696.198.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:32:20 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Zhenwen Xu <helight.xu@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] fix warning on kernel/trace/trace_branch.c
andtrace_hw_branches.c
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:21 +0800, Zhenwen Xu wrote:
> fix warnings that caused the API change of trace_buffer_lock_reserve()
> change files: kernel/trace/trace_hw_branch.c
> kernel/trace/trace_branch.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenwen Xu <helight.xu@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_branch.c | 2 +-
> kernel/trace/trace_hw_branches.c | 8 +++++---
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c b/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c
> index 7a7a9fd..216e2dd 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_branch.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ probe_likely_condition(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect)
> goto out;
>
> pc = preempt_count();
> - event = trace_buffer_lock_reserve(tr, TRACE_BRANCH,
> + event = trace_buffer_lock_reserve(tr->buffer, TRACE_BRANCH,
> sizeof(*entry), flags, pc);
Thanks,
I'll take this as is, and do the update on the local var.
-- Steve
> if (!event)
> goto out;
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hw_branches.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hw_branches.c
> index 23b6385..52a5903 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_hw_branches.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hw_branches.c
> @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ void trace_hw_branch(u64 from, u64 to)
> struct ftrace_event_call *call = &event_hw_branch;
> struct trace_array *tr = hw_branch_trace;
> struct ring_buffer_event *event;
> + struct ring_buffer *buf;
> struct hw_branch_entry *entry;
> unsigned long irq1;
> int cpu;
> @@ -180,7 +181,8 @@ void trace_hw_branch(u64 from, u64 to)
> if (atomic_inc_return(&tr->data[cpu]->disabled) != 1)
> goto out;
>
> - event = trace_buffer_lock_reserve(tr, TRACE_HW_BRANCHES,
> + buf = tr->buffer
> + event = trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buf, TRACE_HW_BRANCHES,
> sizeof(*entry), 0, 0);
> if (!event)
> goto out;
> @@ -189,8 +191,8 @@ void trace_hw_branch(u64 from, u64 to)
> entry->ent.type = TRACE_HW_BRANCHES;
> entry->from = from;
> entry->to = to;
> - if (!filter_check_discard(call, entry, tr->buffer, event))
> - trace_buffer_unlock_commit(tr, event, 0, 0);
> + if (!filter_check_discard(call, entry, buf, event))
> + trace_buffer_unlock_commit(buf, event, 0, 0);
>
> out:
> atomic_dec(&tr->data[cpu]->disabled);
> --
> 1.6.3.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists