[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091008162222.GG14073@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 18:22:22 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] KVM: SVM: Notify nested hypervisor of lost event
injections
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 06:12:28PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/08/2009 12:03 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >From: Alexander Graf<agraf@...e.de>
> >
> >If event_inj is valid on a #vmexit the host CPU would write
> >the contents to exit_int_info, so the hypervisor knows that
> >the event wasn't injected.
> >
> >We don't do this in nested SVM by now which is a bug and
> >fixed by this patch.
>
> We need to start thinking about regression tests for these bugs. It
> would be relatively easy to set up something with save->cr3 == cr3
> (i.e. no isolation, mmu virtualization, etc.).
Should be doable with a in-kernel regression test-suite module, I think.
Triggering such (race-condition like) test cases from userspace is
somewhat hard.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists