[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <56DA32E3-04B4-4B4E-B364-1174AE4E3E50@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 18:46:48 +0200
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] KVM: SVM: Notify nested hypervisor of lost event injections
Am 08.10.2009 um 18:38 schrieb Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>:
> On 10/08/2009 06:32 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> No. The L1 guest needs to execute VMRUN with an interrupt to inject
>> to
>> the L2 guest with event_inj. On that VMRUN instruction emulation an
>> interrupt becomes pending which causes an immediate #vmexit from L2
>> to
>> L2 again without even entering the L2 guest. The bug was that in this
>> case the event which the L1 tried to inject in the L2 was lost
>> because
>> it was not copied to exit_int_info.
>>
>
> (from L1 to L0?)
>
> Wow. Alex, how did you find this?
Hyper-V got stuck and I was trying to think of possible reasons
looking at the logs :-).
Fortunately this patch also seemed to make things work better with KVM
in KVM.
Doesn't really help with regression testing though...
Alex
>
> We can try to cause an interrupt using a signal from another thread,
> but that's too difficult as the first test in a test suite.
>
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists