[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091008171814.GC5073@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 19:18:16 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Improve thread comm resolution in perf
sched
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 06:33:02PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 16:37 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > When we get sched traces that involve a task that was already
> > created before opening the event, we won't have the comm event
> > for it.
>
> pid_synthesize_comm_event() should have taken care of that..
>
> > So if we can't find the comm event for a given thread, we look at the
> > traces that may contain these informations.
>
> Sure, but it would be good to find out why the synthesize bits didn't
> work as expected.
Oh you're right, I didn't notice it.
And it's weird, I've just done some tests, and I always
have the same pids that are found inside the events but
but not in /proc:
7989 -> npviewer.bin
5467 -> xchat
5124 -> firefox
7929 -> npviewer.bin
That's weird. I'm going to look further on the proc filesystem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists