linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] char/vme_scc: adding __init macro to vme

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:04:22 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Matheos Worku <Matheos.Worku@....COM>
Cc:	Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@....de>, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] char/vme_scc: adding __init macro to vme_scc.c

On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Matheos Worku wrote:

> > Alan or Geert, please have a look at the small patch and either pull it
> > through your tree, or please ack' it so Jiri can pull it through the trivial
> > tree.
> > 
> > linux version 2.6.31-rc6 - linus git tree, Do 20. Aug 22:26:06 CEST 2009
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/vme_scc.c b/drivers/char/vme_scc.c
> > index 994e1a5..8b24729 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/vme_scc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/vme_scc.c
> > @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static const struct tty_port_operations scc_port_ops = {
> >   * vme_scc_init() and support functions
> >   *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> >  -static int scc_init_drivers(void)
> > +static int __init scc_init_drivers(void)
> >  {
> >  	int error;
> >  @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int scc_init_drivers(void)
> >  /* ports[] array is indexed by line no (i.e. [0] for ttyS0, [1] for ttyS1).
> >   */
> >  -static void scc_init_portstructs(void)
> > +static void __init scc_init_portstructs(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct scc_port *port;
> >  	int i;
> > @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static void scc_init_portstructs(void)
> >    #ifdef CONFIG_MVME147_SCC
> > -static int mvme147_scc_init(void)
> > +static int __init mvme147_scc_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct scc_port *port;
> >  	int error;
> > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ fail:
> >    #ifdef CONFIG_MVME162_SCC
> > -static int mvme162_scc_init(void)
> > +static int __init mvme162_scc_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct scc_port *port;
> >  	int error;
> > @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ fail:
> >    #ifdef CONFIG_BVME6000_SCC
> > -static int bvme6000_scc_init(void)
> > +static int __init bvme6000_scc_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct scc_port *port;
> >  	int error;
> > @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ fail_free_b_rx:
> >  #endif
> >   -static int vme_scc_init(void)
> > +static int __init vme_scc_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	int res = -ENODEV;
> Then there are issnvram.txt iss.conf etc ... I guess we need to change 
> these as well. How about error messages? I assume they would have ISS in 
> them.

Confused ... how is this related to the patch?

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/