Message-ID: <20091009192642.GB32084@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 9 Oct 2009 12:26:42 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
Cc:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	Denis Karpov <ext-denis.2.karpov@...ia.com>,
	Uwe Kleine-K??nig <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap fixes for v2.6.32-rc3

On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 08:29:24PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 03:08:00PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> >> > * Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com> [091008 15:20]:
> >>
> >> <snip/>
> >>
> >> >> > Here you can see Uwe Kleine-K??nig sending the original patch without
> >> >> > even CC'ing the mmc list:
> >> >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124820861213849&w=2
> >> >> >
> >> >> > And it was unintentionally broken by this one:
> >> >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=125249763422227&w=2
> >> >>
> >> >> Er, actually that one was ok, the problem was introduced only in the
> >> >> final version:
> >> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=125366315417006&w=2
> >> >
> >> > Right, looks like Roger forgot to Cc linux-mmc.
> >> >
> >> >> > I don't see what we are waiting for, the code is clearly broken, even
> >> >> > the compiler warns that nobody is using omap_hsmmc_probe().
> >> >
> >> > I've sent Roger's patch to Andrew & linux-mmc so hopefully it will get
> >> > merged soon:
> >> >
> >> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org/msg00539.html
> >>
> >> I don't see what's specific about mmc in that patch, nor omap. It's
> >> just a fix for an obvious mistake that must be picked ASAP and can't
> >> possibly be NAK'ed.
> >>
> >> There's a tree for trivial fixes:
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/trivial
> >>
> >> And one for includecheck:
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6
> >>
> >> What's the procedure for obvious fixes? I'm CC'ing Greg KH and Andrew
> >> Morton because I think they might interested in fixing these kinds of
> >> issues quickly in the future.
> >
> > What kind of issues?  Why would I be interested, where is the problem?
> 
> The obvious-brain-dead-duh kind of issues, like this one.
> 
> The problem is that OMAP devices (like beagleboard) are not booting
> correctly right now because of a wrong merge. It has been identified,
> tested, and acked, but nobody has picked it up for a pull request, so
> it's not clear it will be on -rc4.

Has the patches been sent from the maintainer to Linus?

Who is the maintainer?  Who normally sends this stuff?

> To me it's not clear who should push the patch, it seems it doesn't
> belong on linux-omap, so Tony is pushing it through linux-mmc, which I
> don't think is the right place. They should be handling mmc-related
> issues, not obvious breakage.

Well, mmc related breakage is fine to handle :)

> In order to keep the engines oiled I think there must be a process to
> flag obvious generic breakage so it's immediately picked; maybe an
> 'obvious-fixes' tree, or a 'simple-fixes' that has 'trivial',
> 'includecheck', and similar, or maybe nothing needs to be done. Up to
> you to decide.

Andrew usually sends stuff like this at times.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists