[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1255059318.7236.13.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 05:35:18 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [.32-rc3] scheduler: iwlagn consistently high in "waiting for
CPU"
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 22:34 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 08:23:37PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 16:55 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > On Thursday 08 October 2009, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:24:16 +0200
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] x86, timers: check for pending timers after (device)
> > > > interrupts
> > > >
> > > > Now that range timers and deferred timers are common, I found a
> > > > problem with these using the "perf timechart" tool.
> > > >
> > > > It turns out that on x86, these two 'opportunistic' timers only
> > > > get checked when another "real" timer happens.
> > > > These opportunistic timers have the objective to save power by
> > > > hitchhiking on other wakeups, as to avoid CPU wakeups by themselves
> > > > as much as possible.
> > >
> > > This patch makes quite a difference for me. iwlagn and phy0 now
> > > consistently show at ~10 ms or lower.
> > >
> > > I do still get occasional high latencies, but those are for things like
> > > "[rpc_wait_bit_killable]" or "Writing a page to disk", where I guess you'd
> > > expect them. Those high latencies are mostly only listed for "Global" and
> > > don't translate to individual processes.
> >
> > I still see very high latencies coming out of idle (last noted was >
> > 300ms, NO_HZ) with this patch, and wonder if the hunk below makes any
> > difference whatsoever for you. Here, it definitely does. (shouldn't)
>
> I'm also seeing these strange, very high latencies here. Your patch
> didn't help unfortunately.
>
> This is from an otherwise idle NO_NZ system:
>
> # ./perf sched latency
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Task | Runtime ms | Switches | Average delay ms | Maximum delay ms |
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ksoftirqd/0:4 | 2.216 ms | 170 | avg: 24.235 ms | max: 808.356 ms |
> ksoftirqd/1:6 | 2.611 ms | 205 | avg: 4.334 ms | max: 165.553 ms |
> migration/2:7 | 0.000 ms | 1 | avg: 3.060 ms | max: 3.060 ms |
>
> With latencytop the ksoftirqd latency is over 1 sec frequently. (Could be
> ondemand CPUfreq governor related?)
That's a separate issue, which Arjan was nice enough to fix for me. He
even wrote the changelog, and used my mouse to do so ;-)
Watch.
Virgin tip pulled this morning, perf sched record sleep 1 on idle box.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Task | Runtime ms | Switches | Average delay ms | Maximum delay ms |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
kicker:5845 | 0.000 ms | 1 | avg: 999.406 ms | max: 999.406 ms |
rt2870TimerQHan:4952 | 0.008 ms | 3 | avg: 0.087 ms | max: 0.131 ms |
Xorg:4913 | 0.099 ms | 2 | avg: 0.027 ms | max: 0.044 ms |
kondemand/3:3106 | 0.014 ms | 2 | avg: 0.013 ms | max: 0.018 ms |
perf:7229 | 3.986 ms | 1 | avg: 0.017 ms | max: 0.017 ms |
events/3:14 | 0.038 ms | 1 | avg: 0.017 ms | max: 0.017 ms |
kondemand/2:3105 | 0.017 ms | 1 | avg: 0.008 ms | max: 0.008 ms |
kondemand/1:3104 | 0.041 ms | 1 | avg: 0.007 ms | max: 0.007 ms |
konsole:5855 | 0.362 ms | 3 | avg: 0.004 ms | max: 0.006 ms |
kondemand/0:3103 | 0.000 ms | 1 | avg: 0.000 ms | max: 0.000 ms |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL: | 4.565 ms | 16 |
---------------------------------------------------
INFO: 40.741% state machine bugs (11 out of 27)
INFO: 51.852% context switch bugs (14 out of 27)
Repeatable. Apply patchlet, and the numbers below become repeatable.
perf_counter tools: make perf sched pass -F 0 to record
Commit 42e59d7d19dc4b4 introduced a sample frequency framework..
.. however it unfortunately changed how perf events get recorded,
and caused sched to miss events.
This patch causes the sched code to use -F 0 to not use the
new framework when recording sched data.
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Arjan The Wise <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
---
tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux-2.6/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
@@ -1902,6 +1902,7 @@ static const char *record_args[] = {
"-f",
"-m", "1024",
"-c", "1",
+ "-F", "0",
"-e", "sched:sched_switch:r",
"-e", "sched:sched_stat_wait:r",
"-e", "sched:sched_stat_sleep:r",
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Task | Runtime ms | Switches | Average delay ms | Maximum delay ms |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xorg:4913 | 2.296 ms | 43 | avg: 0.075 ms | max: 0.686 ms |
kicker:5845 | 3.106 ms | 28 | avg: 0.017 ms | max: 0.307 ms |
perf:7419 | 147.147 ms | 16 | avg: 0.028 ms | max: 0.261 ms |
klipper:6404 | 0.035 ms | 1 | avg: 0.256 ms | max: 0.256 ms |
kondemand/3:3106 | 0.139 ms | 18 | avg: 0.039 ms | max: 0.192 ms |
rt2870TimerQHan:4952 | 0.726 ms | 107 | avg: 0.010 ms | max: 0.165 ms |
konsole:5856 | 0.180 ms | 2 | avg: 0.050 ms | max: 0.094 ms |
kded:5831 | 0.044 ms | 1 | avg: 0.055 ms | max: 0.055 ms |
events/3:14 | 0.066 ms | 3 | avg: 0.018 ms | max: 0.031 ms |
kondemand/2:3105 | 0.015 ms | 2 | avg: 0.020 ms | max: 0.029 ms |
ksoftirqd/3:10 | 0.326 ms | 3 | avg: 0.018 ms | max: 0.027 ms |
kondemand/1:3104 | 0.142 ms | 24 | avg: 0.008 ms | max: 0.023 ms |
rt2870MlmeThrea:4950 | 0.095 ms | 13 | avg: 0.012 ms | max: 0.022 ms |
kondemand/0:3103 | 0.259 ms | 36 | avg: 0.013 ms | max: 0.020 ms |
kwin:5841 | 0.038 ms | 1 | avg: 0.018 ms | max: 0.018 ms |
sync_supers:92 | 0.008 ms | 1 | avg: 0.018 ms | max: 0.018 ms |
events/0:11 | 0.005 ms | 1 | avg: 0.015 ms | max: 0.015 ms |
konsole:5855 | 0.709 ms | 10 | avg: 0.007 ms | max: 0.013 ms |
events/2:13 | 0.009 ms | 1 | avg: 0.011 ms | max: 0.011 ms |
events/1:12 | 0.006 ms | 1 | avg: 0.010 ms | max: 0.010 ms |
mysqld:5030 | 0.185 ms | 1 | avg: 0.009 ms | max: 0.009 ms |
hald-addon-inpu:3191 | 0.006 ms | 1 | avg: 0.006 ms | max: 0.006 ms |
mono:6472 | 0.144 ms | 11 | avg: 0.005 ms | max: 0.006 ms |
ntpd:6020 | 0.030 ms | 1 | avg: 0.005 ms | max: 0.005 ms |
gpg-agent:5783 | 0.047 ms | 1 | avg: 0.005 ms | max: 0.005 ms |
sleep:7420 | 0.973 ms | 2 | avg: 0.003 ms | max: 0.005 ms |
httpd2-prefork:6416 | 0.013 ms | 1 | avg: 0.005 ms | max: 0.005 ms |
mysqld:5031 | 0.172 ms | 1 | avg: 0.005 ms | max: 0.005 ms |
kwrapper:5838 | 0.010 ms | 1 | avg: 0.005 ms | max: 0.005 ms |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL: | 156.930 ms | 332 |
---------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists